Legal Opinion

Wilkes v. Cancelosi (In Re Cancelosi)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 26, 2011No. 19-60458PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RANDALL L. DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.

On June 24, 2011, I conducted the trial (“Trial”) on stipulated facts of the Complaint (“Complaint”) of Beverlee J. Wilkes and Richard H. Wilkes (“the Wilkes”) to except their claim against debtor Robert Raymond Cancelosi III (“Mr. Cancelosi”) from discharge pursuant to § 528(a)(4) and (19) of the Bankruptcy Code. 1 Following argument from the parties, I stated oral findings of fact and conclusions of law on the record and found in favor of the Wilkes on their § 523(a)(19) claim and dismissed their § 523(a)(4) claim. I prepared and entered a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re Mark Riso Shelly Riso, Debtors. Gary L. Snoke v. Mark Riso Shelly RisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Sam E. Brown and Erma Jean Brown v. Freeman WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wieczorek v. JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API