Burickson v. Kleen Laundry Service, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment modified by striking therefrom the third decretal paragraph thereof with respect to the contract bearing date October 28, 1933, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. The proof does not warrant the findings (1) that the agreement of October 16, 1933, was extorted from defendant by duress and coercion by threatening the ruin of defendant’s business; (2) that the agreement is harsh, unfair, unconscionable and impossible of performance and ruinous to defendant’s business. It appears that plaintiff, in order to procure the signing of the agreement by…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Devon Knitwear Co. v. LevinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. RosenzweigNew York Court of Appeals · 1934