Legal Opinion

Russell v. Burton

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1867PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL by the. defendant from- a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought upon a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtBockes, J.

In 1859 the defendant was the owner of an interest in certain property and real estate situated in northern New York, known as the Averill Ore Bed, and of a claim against the state for its use and occupation and for alleged injuries thereto, in regard to which claim legislation was necessary, to answer the wishes and purposes of the owner.

The complaint charges that the defendant, in January of that year, employed the plaintiff to act as his counsel and to bestow his attention and services in and about maturing, preparing and prosecutipg such claim before the legislature of the state, and in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sedgwick v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Lyon v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Harris v. Roof's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Ball v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Brown v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Veazey v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Dunham v. Hastings Pavement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Auerbach v. CurieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Drake v. SieboldNew York Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API