Legal Opinion

Hill v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1933No. 4425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

As stated in our original opinion, this case involves the contention that section 33 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Louisiana (Act No. 20 of 1914, § 33, as amended by Act No. 38 of 1918) has no reference to the preliminary judgment authorized under subsection 3 of section 18 of the act (as amended by Act No. 85 of 1926). We will consider this question, only, on the rehearing, as we are satisfied that the original opinion is correct on all other matters. It presents solely a question of law.

Section 33, as quoted in full in the original opinion, provides that the payments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. FergusonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Mason v. CostanzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lytell v. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Vizina v. Industrial Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Vidrine v. Argonaut-Southwest InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Dupre v. LA RETAILERS ASS'N SELF-INSURERSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Pearson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API