Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Suissevale, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 8, 1981No. 80-226PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the record supports the findings of the Superior Court (Wyman, J.) and the verdict which the court rendered for the plaintiffs. We affirm.

This case arises from an action seeking the recovery of monies paid by the plaintiffs, Nathan and Arnold Zimmerman, under the terms of a series of land sales contracts with the defendant, Suissevale, Inc. (Suissevale). Suissevale defaulted in the underlying action and is not a party to this appeal. The plaintiffs claim that when the defendant Speculator Realty Corp. (Speculator) acquired certain assets…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chagnon Lumber Co., Inc. v. DeMulderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Sargent Lake Ass'n v. DaneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Taylor v. GagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Patch v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Hawthorne Trust v. Maine Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Bielagus v. EMRE of New Hampshire Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Nadeau v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Delaney v. GurrieriSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API