Legal Opinion

Rousel v. Stanger

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1889No. 6239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Parker. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Beckham.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice.—

Appellant instituted this suit to recover a lot in the city of Weatherford.

Plaintiff was formerly the wife of J. A. Rousel. While her marriage existed the lot was purchased and paid for and deeded to her husband. She claims that the consideration paid for it was her separate estate, and also that after the purchase of the lot it became the business homestead of her husband. The lot was purchased by plaintiff’s husband in 1877, and was occupied by him and his family as a residence from 1878 to 1879, when they moved to a different residence owned by Rousel, in which…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Freeman v. ClearyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. CraigoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Sanburn v. DealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API