Legal Opinion

BOBBY E. HENARD v. MONICA ALBERS, LILA FERNANDEZ, and DEPUTY HERBERT

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 3, 2025No. 1:21-cv-03123Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 21-cv-3123-WJM-MDB BOBBY E. HENARD, Plaintiff, v. MONICA ALBERS, LILA FERNANDEZ, and DEPUTY HERBERT, Defendants. ORDER REVOKING HENARD’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS Before the Court are Defendants Jefferson County Deputy Sheriff Hebert, Monica Albers, and Lila Fernandez’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motions to revoke pro se Plaintiff Bobby E. Henard’s in forma pauperis status (“Motions”). (ECF Nos. 291, 294.) The Motions are fully briefed.1 (ECF Nos. 298, 303.) For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Robert Shawn Treff v. Kerry Galetka, Individually and as the Mailroom Supervisor at the Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API