Legal Opinion
Allan v. Chapman, Jr. v. Rudd Paint & Varnish Company, Dave Rivers and Alan Park
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 20, 1969No. 23448PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
This action involves a distributorship agreement between Rudd Paint & Varnish Company (Rudd) and Allan V. Chapman, Jr. The distributorship was for a product known as “Run-Guard,” a substance designed to prevent runs in nylon hosiery. The agreement granted Chapman an exclusive distributorship in Colorado and Alaska; however, this lawsuit relates only to the Colorado business. Difficulties arose between the two parties, and Chapman brought this action against Rudd, its president and its sales director, to recover damages and obtain injunctive relief.
In the posture of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,710 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- John L. LINO, Appellant in No. 72-1672, v. CITY INVESTING CO., a Corporation, Appellant in No. 72-1673Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.