Legal Opinion

Franklin Mining Co. v. Harris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1871PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Houghton Circuit. This was an action of assumpsit brought by Samuel B. Harris, in tile circuit court for the county of Houghton, against the Franklin Mining Company, to recover the balance unpaid of the contract- price for his services for the defendants for the period of one year, at the rate of one thousand eight hundred dollars per annum.

Read the full summary

Error to Houghton Circuit. This was an action of assumpsit brought by Samuel B. Harris, in tile circuit court for the county of Houghton, against the Franklin Mining Company, to recover the balance unpaid of the contract- price for his services for the defendants for the period of one year, at the rate of one thousand eight hundred dollars per annum. The plaintiff alleged that he had been hired for a year, and discharged at the end of eight months, without fault on his part, and had been paid only for the time of actual service rendered. The defendant, pleaded the general issue. The plaintiff…

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

After some hesitation, we are inclined to agree with the circuit judge that there was some evidence from which the jury might infer that the employment of Harris as mining captain was for at least a year. .

Harris’ own evidence was that he objected to giving up an existing employment, which was apparently a permanent one, for an uncertainty; and he asked Wren, the agent who ,was negotiating with him, how he wanted to make the bargain — whether for a specific time or not,2 — and Wren replied that it was immaterial to him; just as Harris felt about' it. Harris then gave his reason for desiring…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Speeder Cycle Co. v. TeeterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Booth v. National India Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  5. Mahiat v. CoddeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API