Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Alabama-Quenelda Graphite Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided October 2, 1929No. 50PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClayton, District Judge

The hill was originally brought by plaintiff Kelly -against the Alabama-Quenelda Graphite Company, a corporation of Delaware, as sole defendant, in the circuit court of Clay county, Ala., on July 27, 1929. The bill was amended, retaining the Alabama-Quenelda GrapMte Company as a defendant and making John L. Senior, Eraneis P. Butler, John W. Esmond, and William H. Wildes, citizens and residents of CMcago, 111., defendants, under date of August 17, 1929. The cause was removed on timely application by the Alabama-Quenelda Graphite Company to tMs court on August 24, 1929. The plaintiff Kelly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Brown v. TrousdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Community Bldg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  5. Taylor v. Decatur Mineral & Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Wright v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Hane v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Wells v. IrwinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1942
  5. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API