In re E.A.L.
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Mckinnon
¶20 I respectfully dissent.
*135¶21 Section 53-21-126, MCA, contemplates the satisfaction of two requirements prior to the involuntary commitment of an individual. The first requirement is a finding that the person suffers from a mental disorder as defined in § 53-21-102(9), MCA. The second requirement directs the court to consider four circumstances relevant to determining whether, as a result of an individual’s mental disorder, commitment is necessary. Relevant here is § 53-21-126(l)(c), MCA: “whether, because of a mental disorder, there is an imminent threat of injury to the respondent or to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Mental Health of C.R.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
- In re D.D.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of DDMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Mental Health of E. M.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Mental Health of GoedertMontana Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.