Legal Opinion

Seals v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 2005No. PD-0678-04PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, and HERVEY, JJ., joined.

The appellant was convicted of possession of more than one gram but less than four grams of methamphetamine. On direct appeal, the appellant complained that blood found mixed with the methamphetamine was improperly included in the aggregate weight as an adulterant or dilu-tant. The court of appeals held that the blood could not be an adulterant or dilu-tant. We will reverse because the court of appeals erred by looking beyond the plain meaning of the legislature’s definition of adulterant or dilutant.

I. Facts

The…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

4Cited by85 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. State v. VasilasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API