Legal Opinion

Woodsmall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1976No. Y-233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Woodsmall appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence based on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery. He contends that because he was subpoenaed to appear at the trial of an accomplice in a robbery, and was brought into the courtroom for identification during the trial he was immunized under Section 914.04, Florida Statutes. We do not agree.

Woodsmall and Kinsey, his accomplice, were charged with robbery. Kinsey was brought to trial first. The State subpoenaed Woodsmall to appear at the trial. During the trial, the State had him brought into the courtroom where a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Foster v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cikora v. WainwrightDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
  2. State v. KitchenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API