Legal Opinion

State v. State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1894No. 5962Published

Original action to wind up the affairs of the state bank of Wahoo, Nebraska, under the banking law of 1889. The receiver appointed by the court filed a petition for an order requiring W. H. Dickinson, Sr., and others to answer and show cause why the undivided one-half interest in the Wahoo Electric Light Company should not be converted into assets of the bank.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

Under the provisions of section 14, chapter 37, Laws of 1889, C. B. Campbell was by this court appointed receiver of the State Bank of Wahoo. Subsequently a petition was by the receiver pre-ented for an order requiring W. H. Dickinson, Sr., W. H. Dickinson, Jr., Charlotte M. Dickinson, and Harriet E. Adams to answer and show cause why the undivided one-half interest in the Wahoo Electric Light Company should not be converted into assets of said 'State Bank. Issues were joined, which presented the question of the bona fides of the interests held by the above Dickinsons and Harriet E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Commercial State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. Exchange BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State v. Commercial & Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API