Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Barr

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

cited: Waite Fraud. Con. 315, 317, 325, 328, 333, 336, 344, 345, 378; 22 W. Ya. 586; 23 W. Ya. 645 ; 29 Am. Dec. 401; Code c. 74, §§ 1, 2; 2 Lorn. Dig. c. 24 § 65; 3 Gratt. 32; 28 Am. Rep. 704, 721 n.; Bump. Fr. Con. 201-204. cited : 11 W. Ya. 229 ; 28 W. Ya. 653; 14 W. Ya. 264; 34 W. Ya. 449; 16 W. Ya. 626; Bump. Fraud. Con. 56; 15 W. Ya. 444; 6 W. Ya. 168.

1Opinion of the Court

EN&lish, Judge:

This was a suit in equity, brought by M. Reilly, Josephus Clark, and George A. Smith, doing business under the firm name of John Ij. Smith & Co., against David Barr and others, in the Circuit Court of Wetzel county, for the purpose of having certain conveyances made by the defendant, David Barr, to his son-in-law and co-defendant, Alexander Furbee, on the 15th and 16th days of February, 1884, *97declared null and void so far as they affect the rights and interests of complainants, and praying for a sale of the property therein described, claiming that said deeds of conveyance are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goshorn's Ex'r v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Knight v. CapitoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Wheelden v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  4. Hughes v. RoperTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RalphsnyderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. Security State Bank v. McIntyreMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Reynolds's Adm'rs v. Gawthrop's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bank v. Prager & SonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API