Legal Opinion

Harsco Corp. v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1987No. 18 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDermott, justice.

Appellant, Harsco Corporation (Harsco), appeals from an order of the Commonwealth Court which affirmed an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. The latter court had refused appellant’s request for a refund of business privilege taxes paid to appellee, the City of Pittsburgh, for the years 1979 through 1981.

The germane facts of this case are as follows. During the tax years in question Harsco conducted a business known as metal recovery, which was designed to recover iron particles from molten slag. Slag is a necessary waste product of steelmaking,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fischer v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Crawford v. Southern Fulton School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. R. G. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Insinger MacHine Co. v. Philadelphia Tax Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Metaltech v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. HAB Industries, Inc. v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Lancaster Laboratories, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Metaltech v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API