Juggilal Kamlapat v. Purvis-Wade Carpet Mills

Eberhardt, Judge.

Plaintiff in execution, Purvis-Wade Carpet Mills, urges that the verdict finding the property subject to the levy was proper because the sale of the jute was a transaction between two firms in which a partner in the purchasing firm was the father of the partners in the selling firm and that badges of fraud appear which authorized the jury to conclude that there had in fact been no sale, or, if so, the sale was made for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding this creditor.

The evidence of the sale, both oral and documentary, is overwhelming. The one fact relied upon…