Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1997No. S96A1507Published

1ConcurrenceSears, Justice

I commend the majority’s foresight in recognizing that a per se prohibition against pro se appearances by corporations is not necessary in certain tribunals, and might, in fact, impose undue hardships. By permitting lay persons to serve as a corporation’s legal representative in courts not of record, the majority has prudently allowed corporations to be represented by non-lawyers in forums which include, among others: (1) the magistrate courts which are *807required to exist in every county of this state;1 (2) administrative tribunals;2 and (3) most city and municipal courts.31 believe it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Sams v. OlahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. St. John's Melkite Catholic Church v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Georgia State Board of Dental Examiners v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Huber v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API