Priest v. Hogan
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
A motion by petition is made “to quash and vacate tbe supersedeas granted in this cause. ’ ’■ It does not appear that a supersedeas has been obtained herein.
It is alleged that on October 17, 1922, the Judge of- the Circuit Court rendered a decree which was that day recorded reversing a decree of the County Judge’s Court in probating a will; that on December 4, 1922, the Judge made an order fixing the amount and condition of a supersedeas bond in an appeal to be taken from the said decree of the Circuit Judge to the Supreme Court; that a bond was approved and filed on December 4, 1922; and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Baker, Et Ux. v. Vero Indian River Producers Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- In re Baldridge's EstateDade County Judge's Court · 1953
- Tippins v. Belle Mead Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935