Legal Opinion

Priest v. Hogan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 28, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

A motion by petition is made “to quash and vacate tbe supersedeas granted in this cause. ’ ’■ It does not appear that a supersedeas has been obtained herein.

It is alleged that on October 17, 1922, the Judge of- the Circuit Court rendered a decree which was that day recorded reversing a decree of the County Judge’s Court in probating a will; that on December 4, 1922, the Judge made an order fixing the amount and condition of a supersedeas bond in an appeal to be taken from the said decree of the Circuit Judge to the Supreme Court; that a bond was approved and filed on December 4, 1922; and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker, Et Ux. v. Vero Indian River Producers Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. In re Baldridge's EstateDade County Judge's Court · 1953
  3. Tippins v. Belle Mead Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API