Legal Opinion

McMullin v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 1952No. 16670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

We are confronted with a case of alleged constructive civil contempt and the question of the application of our present rule of civil procedure thereto.

As we find subdivision (a) of Rule 107 of our rules of civil procedure, as to what constitutes civil contempt, the proponents apparently decided to combine two sections of the old code in a briefer form, and as stated by a member of that committee in address No. 16, “There is no material change in substance.”

Paragraph (3) of section 356 of the old code was, “Disobedience to any lawful writ, order, rule or process issued by the court, or judge…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Monroe v. EvansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Hartsel Springs Ranch of Colorado, Inc. v. Cross Slash Ranch, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. McMullin v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API