Castro Convertible Corporation v. Julie Ann Castro
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Castro Convertible Corporation employed Bernard Castro. Bernard was insured under a group life policy offered to its employees by Castro Convertible and issued by Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company. Julie Ann Castro, the wife of Bernard, 1 and defendant-appellee, was the primary beneficiary of the life insurance proceeds. The Castros’ infant daughters, Kimberly Ann and Deena Theresa, were the contingent beneficiaries. Julie Ann shot and killed Bernard. Because of its uncertainty whether Julie Ann had murdered her husband (in which event the proceeds of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Feaster v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Morgareidge v. HoweySupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Miracle House Corporation v. HaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Interstate Fire Insurance Company v. J. Ed SayersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alfred L. Bochese v. Town of Ponce InletCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- AGB Oil Co. v. CRYSTAL EXPLORATION, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Quinn-L Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1990
- Temeron, Inc. v. Ferraro Energy Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Continental Automotive Systems v. AvanciCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.