Legal Opinion

Application of Charles C. Cohn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 18, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8357PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejections of appellant’s claim 12 1 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious in view of prior art and of claims 12-14 as failing to comply with 35 U.S. C. 112, second paragraph.

THE INVENTION

The claims before us are directed to a method of producing non-metallic appearing finishes on aluminum surfaces. The specification details specific methods whereby various finishes may be obtained, “categorized according to their appearance as being frosted, opaque or glazed.” In general, the methods comprise the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. In re CormanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. In re MattisonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. In re MeratCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API