Application of Charles C. Cohn
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejections of appellant’s claim 12 1 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious in view of prior art and of claims 12-14 as failing to comply with 35 U.S. C. 112, second paragraph.
THE INVENTION
The claims before us are directed to a method of producing non-metallic appearing finishes on aluminum surfaces. The specification details specific methods whereby various finishes may be obtained, “categorized according to their appearance as being frosted, opaque or glazed.” In general, the methods comprise the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
3Cited by13 opinions
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re CormanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re MattisonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- In re MeratCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.