Legal Opinion

Henness v. DeWine

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 5, 2020No. 20-5243Relating-to

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as:

592 U. S. ____

(2020) 1 Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES WARREN K. HENNESS v. MIKE DEWINE, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 20–5243. Decided October 5, 2020 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Statement of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari. The State of Ohio plans to execute petitioner using a three-drug protocol of midazolam, a paralytic agent, and po- tassium chloride. Petitioner challenges this method of exe- cution as unconstitutional, partly on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Campbell v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API