Legal Opinion
People v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
There is no merit to defendant’s claim that a Mapp hearing was warranted by her allegation that the arresting officer did not, as he claimed, see her engage in criminal activity as he approached to arrest her. Such "allegations do not dispute the sufficiency of probable cause for [defendant’s] arrest based on the earlier drug transaction with the undercover officer” (People v Marte, 207 AD2d 314, 316, lv denied 84 NY2d 937), as to which defendant’s motion papers "merely disclaimed involvement in unlawful activity” (Matter of Randy S., 222 AD2d 509, 510; cf., People v Hightower, 85 NY2d 988),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. D'AlessandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. HightowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BerdeciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. HenriquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. AlersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998