Legal Opinion

Zelinsky v. Tax Appeals Tribunal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lahtinen, J.

The issue before the Court is whether the Department of Taxation and Finance (hereinafter Department) violated the Commerce Clause or the Due Process Clause of the Federal Constitution when they allocated all of the income of a nonresident, petitioner Edward A. Zelinsky (hereinafter petitioner), to New York under the so-called “convenience of the employer” test. The stipulated facts provide in relevant part that, during 1994 and 1995, petitioner was a resident of Connecticut and was employed as a professor of law at Cardozo Law School in New York City. His…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Zelinsky v. Commissioner of Taxation & Fin. of the State of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API