Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Kunkler Transp. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1924No. 4302PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBourquin, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Appellants’ first contention is that the condition for redelivery of the ship is invalid and that the bond can be exonerated only by payment of the recoveries- In support of this they appeal to Comp. Stat. § 1567, and to rule 12, Supreme Court Admiralty Rules, which provide that a claimant may recover possession of the vessel upon bond in double the amount of libelant’s claim, and conditioned to answer tho decreo and to abide by and pay the money by it awarded. Their argument is that thus only can claimant secure delivery of the ship; that delivery…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Two MarysDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Marunaka Maru No. 88District Court, D. Alaska · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API