Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 2003No. 03-160PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I THIBODEAUX, Judge.

The Defendant, Joseph Michael Dixon, appeals his conviction of second degree cruelty to juveniles, La.R.S. 14:93.2.3, and his sentence of thirty years at hard labor. He asserts that the sentence imposed was excessive in comparison to the nine year sentence imposed on the co-defendant, the mother of the juvenile. Additionally, he maintains that the trial court erred in determining the competency of the child witness, and the sufficiency of the evidence.

For the following reasons, we affirm.

LAW AND DISCUSSION

Sufficiency of the Evidence

Louisiana Revised Statutes 14:93.2.3…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HearoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. State v. CookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  3. State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. State v. QuimbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. State v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. State v. DayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. State v. SimpsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks DayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API