Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Leet

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1891Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Stark county; the Hon. T. M. Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1DissentJustice Baker

I do not concur in the conclusion reached by a majority of the court. The intervening Sunday was not a judicial day, and was not a “day of the term.” That Sunday is dies non juridieus, has frequently been announced in this State. Burton et al. v. City of Chicago, 53 Ill. 87; Chicago v. Vulcan Iron Works, 93 id. 222; Langabier v. Fairbury, Pontiac and Northwestern Railroad Co. 64 id. 243; Scammon v. City of Chicago, 40 id. 146; Baxter v. The People, 3 Gilm. 368. In Michie et al. v. Michie’s Admr. 17 Gratt. 109, it was expressly held that a Sunday which intervened between the first and tenth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. DohrmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Michie v. Michie's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1866
  3. Meng v. WinklemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Burton v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API