Legal Opinion
Quincy v. Texas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1951No. 4101PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
Floyd E. Quincy, an unenrolled one-half blood Chickasaw Indian, born in 1913, inherited in 1923, the tax-exempt homestead allotment of his father, a full-blood restricted Chickasaw Indian. In 1936 and 1937, he executed certain conveyances to the land through which the appellees here claim some recorded interests.
By this suit, Quincy seeks to invalidate these conveyances on the ground that they were made in violation of the restrictions imposed by the Act of January 27, 1933, 47 Stat. 777, providing in material part that “where the entire interest in any tract of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McCurdy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Chisholm v. HouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. StufflebeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Biard v. CarltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Biard v. CarltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952