Legal Opinion

Barkman v. Barkman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

‘ Forcible Detainer.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Haneoy, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Presiding Justice Ball

delivered the opinion of the court.

Prior to June 9,1899, appellee and appellant, his wife, with their two children, were living in the top flat of a building known as Mo. 5218 Lake avenue, Chicago, Illinois, the legal title of which then was and still is in appellee. On that day appellant brought a suit for divorce and obtained an injunction ordering him to keep away from said premises and not to interfere with her possession of the same. October, 1899, a decree was entered in said cause, granting a divorce, for his fault, finding that appellee should pay appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. MarshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Jordan v. KatzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
  3. Winslow v. NobleIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Barkman v. BarkmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Lyles v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Gas & Oil Co. v. RizerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Celotex Co. v. KoblitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  3. Orthwein v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API