Legal Opinion

McMath v. DeBardelaben

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Tuscaloosa Chancery Court. Tried before lion. Thomas Cobbs. The-facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBb.ickell, C. J.

The original bill, filed by the appellant, seeks the partition of lands, and, incidentally, an account of rents and profits. The allegations are, that the father of the complainant died intestate, seized and possessed of the lands, whereby, eo instcmti his death, they descended to the complainant and his brothers and sisters, as tenants in common. Subsequently, without authority, the mother of the complainant made a sale and conveyance of the lands, purporting to pass the fee simple, and by mesne conveyances they have passed into the possession of the defendant, who holds and claims them…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horton v. SledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  2. Godfrey v. GodfreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  4. Ormond v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  5. Deloney v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Stein v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. McQueen v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Johns v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Gayle v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API