L. Mayer & Co. v. McLure
Mississippi Supreme Court
ERROR to the Circuit Court of Claiborne, county. Hon. Stan-hope Posey, judge. On the 22d February, 1856, plaintiffs filed their complaint against the defendant as administratrix of James W. McLure, founded on a note of her intestate, dated January 29, 1853, for $2505 45, payable, on the 1st December following, to the order of D. Hoff-heimer, and indorsed by Hoffheimer to the plaintiffs.
Read the full summary
ERROR to the Circuit Court of Claiborne, county. Hon. Stan-hope Posey, judge. On the 22d February, 1856, plaintiffs filed their complaint against the defendant as administratrix of James W. McLure, founded on a note of her intestate, dated January 29, 1853, for $2505 45, payable, on the 1st December following, to the order of D. Hoff-heimer, and indorsed by Hoffheimer to the plaintiffs. The defendant denied generally the allegations of the complainant, and specially answered that her intestate was an infant when the note was made. The plaintiffs replied, setting up an act of the legislature,…
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
This cause was submitted to us on demurrer to the answer of Thomas W. Broughton, administrator de lonis non on the estate of James W. McLure, deceased, filed in this court, to the scire facias against him. The point involved in this demurrer, was considered and determined in connection with a motion involving the same principle, in the case of The New Orleans, Jackson, and Great Northern Railroad Co. v. Thomas Rollins, Administrator, ante, and decided a few days since. It is there held, that the administrator de lonis non, under our statutes, being in full privity with the previous…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Field v. WeirMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fetrow v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Carney v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910