Legal Opinion

China National Chartering Corp. v. Pactrans Air & Sea Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 16, 2008No. 06 Civ. 13107(LAK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a motion by the third party defendants (collectively, “Devon”) to vacate Supplemental Rule B attachments obtained by defendant-third party plaintiff Pactrans Air & Sea Inc. (“Pactrans”) and for counter-security. Magistrate Judge Ronald E. Ellis has filed a report and recommendation (the “R & R”) suggesting that the Court grant the motion to vacate and deny counter-security. Pactrans objects. The matter raises once again the question when a court ought to vacate a Rule B attachment on equitable grounds.

Facts

Dev…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Competitive Technologies v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
  3. Grupke v. Linda Lori Sportswear, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. China National Chartering Corp. v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Peninsula Petroleum Far East Pte. Ltd. v. Crystal Cruises, LLC Star Cruises (HK) LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
  3. Platina Bulk Carriers PTE Ltd v. Praxis Energy Agents DMCCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  4. WAG SPV I, LLC v. Fortune Global Shipping & Logistics, LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API