Legal Opinion

Powerine Co. v. Zion's Sav. Bank & Trust Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1944No. 6690PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

The factual situation here involved and the authority for our decision is contained in the report of the first appeal of this case in 103 Utah 441, 135 P. 2d 906.

We there decided the following propositions:(1) That the credit application, plaintiff’s exhibit “A” was in fact a letter of credit from John H. Russell to the Powerine Company, whereby he lent his credit to his son George R. Russell and to Russell’s Inc., on an open account with plaintiff.(2) That John H. Russell was not liable on the chattel mortgage, or for any deficiency after foreclosure sale of the mortgaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powerine Co. v. Russell's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Forbes v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kelsch v. DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Utah Dept. of Admin. Serv. v. Pub. Serv. Com'nUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API