Legal Opinion
Citibank, N. A. v. Velazquez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 11, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated July 26, 2000, as denied that branch of its motion which was for leave to enter a deficiency judgment against the defendant Clemencia Velazquez, a/k/a Clemencia Rubiano.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff’s unopposed motion to confirm the referee’s report of sale, and for leave to enter a deficiency judgment against the mortgagors,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Funk v. BarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brady v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lawton v. LawtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russo v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- City of Plattsburgh v. BornerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Matthew L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- James B. Nutter & Co. v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Delta Funding Corp. v. KhaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.