Legal Opinion · Dissent

Graves v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1996No. 24957Published

1Dissent

Rose, J., with whom Springer, J., joins,

dissenting:

I dissent. The district court failed to adequately canvass Graves to establish that he intelligently and knowingly waived his right to counsel.

A criminal defendant has the right to self-representation under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 818-19 (1975). However, an accused who chooses self-representation must knowingly and intelligently waive the right to counsel.1 Id. at 835. Such a choice can be *130competent and intelligent even though the accused lacks the skill and experience of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Garnick v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lyons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Arajakis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API