Legal Opinion

Hess v. Peck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 8, 1903No. Gen. No. 4160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mechanics’ lien proceeding. Error to the Circuit Court of Whiteside County; the Hon. Frank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

Helen J. Brookfield owned two lots in Sterling. Eli C. Hess contracted with her to build a house on each lot. Hess made a sub-contract with John Peck for lumber and other materials and for the plastering. As the work progressed there were manv disagreements between Peck and Hess. Peck having, as he claimed, performed his contract, filed a bill against Hess and Mrs. Brookfield for a mechanic’s lien upon the premises. Hess answered and filed a cross-bill for an accounting with Peck. Mrs. Brookfield answered bill and cross-„bill.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Esperanza Mining Co. v. Shandon Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In RE JOHNSON v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API