Legal Opinion
Matter of Grossbarth v. Danker, Milstein & Ruffo, P.C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 31, 2016No. 2015-07217PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding to recover an attorney’s fee pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (b), the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bartlett, J.), dated June 4, 2015, as dismissed the petition.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In this proceeding, the petitioner, Joel Grossbarth, as successor in interest to Tognino & Grossbarth, LLP, sought a money judgment in his favor and against the respondent, the law firm of Dankner, Milstein & Ruffo, P.C., sued herein as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rowley v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Brody v. RBC Mtge. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Lindgren v. Capital Area-Hudson Val. N.Y. Dental, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of Grossbarth v. Dankner, Milstein & Ruffo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018