Weatherall Aluminum Products Co. v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
This is an appeal from a municipal court order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. It is before us upon transfer from the appellate department of the Los Angeles Superior Court. (Rule 62 (a), Cal. Rules of Court.)
The case involves interpretation of the scope and meaning of the term “home solicitation contract” in section 1689.5 et seq. of the Civil Code. The facts, briefly stated, are these: Defendants obtained plaintiff’s name and telephone number from the yellow pages of the telephone directory. Defendants telephoned plaintiff who sent a representative to…
2Cited by16 opinions
- People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Crystal v. West & Callahan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Todd Morris v. Steffes Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Aluminum Shake Roofing, Inc. v. HirayasuHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Williams v. Kapilow & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.