Gustafson v. Gustafson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
In this partition action, the trial court found the U.S. Government’s tax lien to be superior to any interest the appellant James L. Gustafson and his successors in interest claim in the proceeds of the sale of the partitioned real estate. We affirm the judgment of the district court for Harlan County.
A partition action is an action in equity and is reviewable by this court de novo on the record. Sherman v. Schulz, 220 Neb. *449375, 370 N.W.2d 123 (1985).
Appellant Gustafson obtained part of his interest in the partitioned real estate, located in Harlan County, from the estate of his father.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Landon v. PettijohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Smith v. BerberichNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Watmore v. FordNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Sherman v. SchulzNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dugan v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Channer v. CummingNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Morello v. Land Reutilization CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Watts v. Butte School District No. 5District Court, D. Nebraska · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.