State v. Cuccinello

On exceptions. The respondent, tried on an indictment for assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to kill, was convicted by a jury of assault and battery found by the presiding justice to be of a high and aggravated nature. R. S., Chap. 130, Sections 6 and 21.

The bill of exceptions does not meet the minimum requirements of acceptable practice. The bill reads:

“Exceptions are here now listed;(1) On page 73 of transcript which is contrary to facts or law.”

The remaining seven exceptions are identical, except for a change in the reference to the page of the transcript.

Nothing more is told of…