Perrine v. San Jacinto Valley Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a mandamus suit, adjudging that the plaintiffs, under the water certificate set out in paragraph III of the complaint, are “entitled to receive thereunder a continuous flow of ten (10) inches of water . . . for and during the seven summer months, as therein mentioned'. . . and to the further right to cumulate the use of said water in the way and manner set forth in the findings filed herein, and to receive from such corporation such cumulated flow of water to which they were and are so entitled twice a month in a head of flow not exceeding sixty (60)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hewitt v. San Jacinto & Pleasant Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911