Commercial State Bank v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polh District Court. — W. H. McHenry, Judge. Interveners file petition asking that a certain judgment entered against the garnishee in the original cause be set aside. Opinion states the facts. Cause tried in equity. Decree dismissing petition of intervention. Interveners appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
1. G-™-- : nftheef effect proceealng!to On the 23d day of June, 1908, judgment was entered in the district court in and for Polk County, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, E. D. Pierce, for the sum of $3,400. On the 17th day of January, 1911, a general execution was issued upon this judgment, and on the 18th day of January, one E. N. Bailey and the Sac County State Bank were duly garnished as the supposed debtors of the judgment defendant. On the 28th day of March, 1911, the said garnishees answered in writing as follows, which answer was duly filed in the cause:
“Comes now…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seymour v. AultmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Burlington & Missouri River Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Houston v. Wolcott & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1858
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geck v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Abe M. Draisner v. Liss Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Heisinger v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Coulter v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Sanders v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.