Legal Opinion

Grace v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 15, 2005No. Nos. SC03-1272, SC04-881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have for review Grace v. Royal Indemnity Co., 858 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), and Ingraham v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 875 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), both of which cite to a case that was pending review in this Court (i.e., Inservices, Inc. v. Aguilera, 837 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review granted, 847 So.2d 975 (Fla.2003)). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). We consolidate Grace and Ingraham for purposes of this opinion.

This Court recently quashed the Third District’s decision in Inservices. See Aguilera v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jollie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Inservices, Inc. v. AguileraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Ingraham v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Grace v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ingraham v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API