Legal Opinion

Rigg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 2016No. 3D15-2535Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2015); Harris v. State, 30 So.3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

As the appellant’s motion in the circuit court and this appeal are successive, the appellant is cautioned that further successive and non-meritorious filings may subject him to sanctions. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2015), and Spencer v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 823 So.2d 752 (Fla.2002).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010