Legal Opinion

State v. Cullen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1994No. 92-1027 CR; CA A78194Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

The state appeals a judgment entered before trial dismissing an indictment against defendant. ORS 138.060-(1); State v. Martinez, 97 Or App 170, 776 P2d 3 (1989). We reverse and remand.

Defendant moved, before trial, to require the state to disclose the identity of several unnamed informants referred to in an affidavit for a search warrant that was executed at her home. The court granted the motion as to one informant. The state elected not to disclose the informant’s identity, and the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. OEC 510(4)(b).

The state argues that the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. VatlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API