Legal Opinion

Lum Sung v. Luning

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

This is an action of assumpsit wherein the plaintiffs claim of the defendant the sum of four hundred and seventy-five dollars, Balance due under a certain contract in writing for the erection of a dwelling-house. In the declaration the plaintiffs are named as Lum Sung, Lo Pau and Pong Chong, doing business as “Yee Sing Tai Company.” Attached to the declaration and referred to therein, is a copy of the contract and in such *666copy tbe parties of the second part, builders, are described as “Yee Sing Tie.” At the trial the plaintiffs offered in evidence the original…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bevier v. DillinghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Martin v. KerrHawaii Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. SteinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Correa v. BaldwinHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lau Bow v. KileyHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  4. United States ex rel. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. Burrell Construction Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1910
  5. Von Hamm-Young Co. v. WelshHawaii Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API