Legal Opinion · Dissent

Union American Insurance Co. v. Cabrera

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 1998No. 97-2547Published

1DissentJorgenson, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the jury instructions were in accordance with the law and were entirely proper. The court’s instruction to the jury simply tracked, word for word, section 627.727, Florida Statutes, which requires a written rejection of UM coverage. The insurer’s position throughout the trial was that it had offered UM coverage to the named insured, and that the trucking company had rejected that offer in writing. However, the insurer’s witness further testified that it could not produce that written rejection because the document had been destroyed. Therefore, the jury was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bohannon v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Kinya v. Lifter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Yacker v. TeitchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. City of North Bay Village v. BraelowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API