Ex Parte Dial
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted the petition for writ of certiorari in this case because the petitioner, through the utilization of Rule 39 (k) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, demonstrated that the Court of Criminal Appeals, 387 So.2d 871, in its opinion had not addressed an issue, properly preserved at the trial below, the effect of which was to render the opinion in conflict with other decisions on the exact same issue.
We agree and reverse and remand.
The Court of Criminal Appeals held, and we think properly so, that the state had discharged its burden of showing that the inculpatory statements made by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fiorella v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Adams, Rowe & NormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Harris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Brownlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Magwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Gobble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.