Legal Opinion

Kruse v. State Tax Commission

Oregon Tax Court

Decided July 12, 1967Published

1Opinion of the Court

Edward H. Howell, Judge.

The question before the court in this ease is whether certain timber sold in 1960 was a capital asset as defined in ORS 316.408, thereby giving rise to a capital gain, or as the tax commission contends, property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business resulting in ordinary income.

During the time involved the material part of ORS 316.408 (repealed by Or L 1965, ch 410) stated:

“For the purpose of ORS 316.408 to 316.450, ‘capital asset’ means property held by the taxpayer (whether or not connected with Ms trade…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McCollum v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API